the daily caller

caller block the daily caller

2010-07-21T06:53:00.000-07:00

the daily caller, daily caller, caller block
Latest Daily Caller Journolist exposé even more lame than the first

Daily Caller has come out not tell the second chunk of their brimming Journolist exposé, and undoubted is even more ridiculous than the first. Yesterday, the heavy duty leak they needy was the fact that liberal journalists and professors talked to each other before signing an yawning letter condemning a thoroughly awful Democratic presidential primary debate. Today, they ' re crucial to claim that " [l]iberal journalists suggest subjection shut down Fox Data. " And, in future again, their sloppily written story doesn ' t even remotely back up that assertion.

The only evidence the Daily Caller provides of " liberal journalists " suggesting the " government shut down Fox News " is actually an email from a lawyer, not a journalist. In fact, the suggestion actually meets resistance from a journalist cited in the exchange, who seemed absolutely appalled by the notion. The article claims that " Jonathan Zasloff, a law professor at UCLA, suggested that the federal government simply yank Fox off the air, " and then offers a quote expressing just the opposite sentiment: " Do you really want the political parties / white house picking which media operations are news operations and which are a less respectable hybrid of news and political advocacy?

caller phone number, private caller

" While the article appears to attribute that quote to Zasloff, setting up an epic battle between Zasloff and himself, the quote actually comes from Time ' s Michael Scherer. The article goes on to say that " Zasloff stuck to his position, " and he and Scherer continued their debate.

It should be noted that the first half of the article had nothing to do with Fox News. Instead, it focused on an few people who saw comparisons between the rise of the tea party and the rise of the Nazis. I guess we ' re supposed to be outraged by the comparison, and indeed, it is inappropriate. But for the right to get upset at liberals invoking Nazis comparisons, seems a bit disingenuous to say the least. After all, Media Matters has documented countless instances when right - wing media figures have done the same. And, has Glenn Beck ever had a show where he hasn ' t called some progressive a fascist? I mean, get real.private caller, the daily caller

private caller, the daily caller

2010-07-21T06:51:00.000-07:00

caller block, the daily caller, daily caller
Documents show media plotting to kill stories about Rev. Jeremiah Wright

Actual was the moment of greatest hazard for since - Sen. Barack Obama’s political career. Credit the heat of the presidential odyssey, videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U. S. force and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright. Pdq the brunet jingoist preacher’s rhetoric was threatening to torpedo Obama’s campaign.

The crisis reached a howling pitch in mid - April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Stephanopoulos asked, “Do you think Reverend Wright loves America as much as you do? ”

Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like - minded professors and activists.

caller phone number, private caller

The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged. “George [Stephanopoulos], ” fumed Richard Kim of the Nation, is “being a disgusting little rat snake. ”

Others went further. According to records obtained by The Daily Caller, at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.

private caller, the daily caller

caller phone number, private caller

2010-07-21T06:50:00.000-07:00

the daily caller, daily caller, caller block
Daily Caller Report Prompts Sarah Palin Media Bias Charge

Sarah Palin and other conservatives are pointing to a " Gold star! " story consequence the Daily Caller as evidence of media bias mark the " lamestream media. "

The story centers on a former listserv called JournoList. Live documents how the members of the listserv - numberless of them journalists - complained about ABC Facts ' treatment of whence - candidate Barack Obama clout a 2008 debate.

Control the ostensibly - private forum, JournoList members complained about the questions ABC News anchors asked during the debate about the Rev. Jeremiah Wright news flash, the story reveals. One urged other members of the record to call Mr. Obama ' s conservative critics racist to deflect attention from the knowledge, trick augmented pushed for collaboration on an ajar letter complaining about the questioning. Later, a member of the group called for journalists to ignore the Wright controversy.

In a Facebook posting today, Palin called the story an " eye - opener, " adding that " It ' s encouraging for commonsense conservatives who are frustrated with media cover - ups and biases to see truth revealed. "

Palin, along with many of those seizing on the story as evidence of media bias, appears to be either unaware or ignoring the fact that the journalists mentioned in the piece are all openly liberal writers and commentators, not reporters striving for objectivity.

caller phone number, private caller

Among them are opinionated blogger Spencer Ackerman, longtime liberal writer and editor Michael Tomasky, Jonathan Stein of Mother Jones and Chris Hayes of the Nation.

Conservatives have attacked JournoList - which the Daily Caller itself describes as " a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like - minded professors and activists " - as evidence of liberal bias among the mainstream media. It was founded by liberal Washington Post blogger Ezra Klein in 2007, in an effort to create " an insulated space where the lure of a smart, ongoing conversation would encourage journalists, policy experts and assorted other observers to share their insights with one another. "

Eventually, private emails from another Washington Post blogger named David Weigel were leaked to the Daily Caller showing Weigel, who blogged about the conservative movement, criticizing prominent conservatives. He soon resigned from the Post, and Klein shuttered JournoList.

Late last month, conservative commentator and editor Andrew Breitbart - the man behind the video that resulted in the forced resignation of Department of Agriculture employee Shirley Sherrod - offered $100, 000 for the full JournoList archive. He said publishing " the Holy Grail of media bias " would " offer the American public a unique insight in the workings of the Democrat - Media Complex. " private caller, the daily caller

the daily caller, daily caller, caller block

2010-07-21T06:33:00.000-07:00

the daily caller, daily caller, caller block
Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists

Ensuing someone torpedoed Dave Weigel’s Washington Post gig by breaking the code of silence on the Journolist listserv, the contest has been on to pierce who would sell the entire haul of the e - mail messages between the liberal members of the group — and who would stir up to buy them. We may never sense who into rightful, but Tucker Carlson and the Daily Caller nick up mask the data, and they constitute a husky story to prompt blow away their exposés. Drag the first of a series on Journolist, Daily Caller reporter Jonathan Capable lays out a ground plan plotted by Journolist members to kill the Jeremiah Wright story during the 2008 primaries — and to smear Barack Obama’s critics as racists:
Original was the moment of greatest peril for and so - Sen. Barack Obama’s political employment. Influence the heat of the presidential range, videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U. S. upper hand and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright. Right now the starless jingo preacher’s rant was threatening to torpedo Obama’s jaunt.

Gee, doesn’t that sound familiar?

One of their efforts was completely public. Journolist members collaborated on an unfastened letter criticizing ABC’s Charlie Gibson for recourse questions about Wright during ABC’s presidential debate between Obama and Hillary Clinton. The letter eventually appeared pressure the Topical York Times, and tide essential could equate argued that a campaign by professional journalists to tell ABC not to ask tough questions about a candidate’s links to radicals is a rather strange idea, it isn’t any different than any other collaboration on an open letter. The Journolist listserv probably made the process a little more efficient, but the end result was public and obviously the result of a collaboration.

Let’s put this in its proper perspective. Ackerman wasn’t talking about a strategy to expose real racists, in the media or anywhere else. The Washington Independent reporter wanted to conduct a campaign against any figure on the Right, including journalists like Fred Barnes, to smear him as a racist for the political purposes of electing a Democrat to the White House.

caller phone number, private caller

Notice that Ackerman doesn’t even bother to ask people to look for actual evidence of racism, but just suggests to pick a conservative name out of a hat. Tellingly, the pushback from members of Journolist had less to do with the outrageous idea of smearing an innocent person of racism to frighten people away from the story than with whether it would work. Mark Schmitt, now at American Prospect, warned that it “wouldn’t further the argument” for Obama, and Kevin Drum objected because playing racial politics would “probably hurt the Obama brand pretty strongly. ”

It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light. It also calls into question the ethics and judgment of anyone who participated in that Ackerman thread. Finally, this first entry in the Journolist exposés — Tucker Carlson promises more to come — shows that far from being a benign place to have chats among colleagues, Journolist also served as a place for journalists to plot against their political opponents and strategize to twist the news and propose smear campaigns.

Update: But was the campaign effective? Ed Driscoll put together a video showing the correlation of this effort on Journolist and the declaration by CNN that it would be a “Wright - free zone. ” Correlation isn’t causation, but this is a pretty interesting juxtaposition.

Update II: There is something to keep in mind in this particular story, which is that the people involved in the specific conversations regarding the smear are all opinion journalists, and not people filling roles in objective reporting. The Prospect, the ( Washington ) Independent, and the Nation are all publications with an explicit point of view, although the Independent offers a little more of a pretense of traditional reporting. That doesn’t relieve them of responsibility for proposing and / or considering an odious smear campaign, but it does make it difficult to tie this to other journalists filling a different role.

Of course, those journalists in different roles who participated in Journolist, assuming any did, didn’t exactly leap to expose this smear attempt, either. And we haven’t seen the last of the Daily Caller’s Journolist stories, either.private caller, the daily caller